Pre-empting the release of the Ruddock Panel Report on Religious Freedom, the Greens recently introduced a Bill to the Senate. It seeks to amend the Sex Discrimination Act and risks the freedom of religious Australians. The leaked recommendations of the Ruddock Report would continue the current exemptions in the Sex Discrimination Act that allow religious schools to require staff and students to publicly uphold the teaching, ethos and behaviours of the religion (or at least not publicly contradict them) on matters of sexual orientation, relationship status and gender identity. However, the Greens’ Discrimination Free Schools Bill constrains religious freedom by removing exemptions that extend well beyond religious schools. It affects the practices of any religious body—whether explicitly educational or not—if the practice is connected with the provision by the body of any type of education or training. This would include instruction for ordinary members of the religion, be they in the local church, mosque or synagogue. It could even apply to sermons if they are understood as “an act or practice connected with the provision of education or training by the religious body” under the proposed amendment to s.37 of the Sex Discrimination Act, and s. 12 of the Fair Work Act. In effect, the Bill may empower staff and students who disagree with their religious institution’s values on these issues to publicly speak and act against those values by allowing discrimination lawsuits. For example, the Bill could use the threat of discrimination lawsuits against institutions if they require a teacher or student to stop promoting material or conduct contrary to the ethos of the institution. According to the Bill, any training and education provided by a religious body cannot be seen to discriminate against people on the grounds of gender, sexual orientation or gender identity. Nor can it discriminate in relation to employing people who provide that training. Beyond schools, the Bill removes exemptions for education by theological colleges. It also applies to any education provided by a religious institution. For example, the training services provided for youth workers, chaplains, missionaries, or instructors in theological education.The only training left untouched by the Bill is for candidates seeking to become clergy in the faith, such as imams, rabbis, or priests. Several religions consider that persons in same-sex relationships are not conforming to the beliefs and practices of the religion and therefore would not make suitable youth workers, chaplains, missionaries, or instructors in theological education for that religion. However, under the Bill, refusal to admit persons in same-sex relationships into any of these forms of training would be unlawful discrimination. This is a deep and unjustified interference with the freedom of religions to select, train and appoint persons who will represent the religion to the world. Under the amendment, then, religious bodies would either have to go against their beliefs, or not provide the education or training. It is an attempt to compel uniformity and presents a risk to religious bodies and adherents. In addition to training for specific roles, general religious education could also be affected. For example, the training of regular adherents of the faith, including members receiving instruction in the fundamentals of their religion and its implication for areas including family life, relationships, marriage, wealth, and so on.
www.i4cs.com.au/greens-2018-schools-bill-to-regulate-sermons/?fbclid=IwAR2OJMxMM1Ba_-TbIUsUCy62CXY_COztO0RFoHrYLZGApmEJjHmntfstL4wThis is an absolute shocker. Their pernicious bill can be found here:
www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s1147 Not to be outdone, Bill Shorten and Labor have already told us of their plans to get rid of all school chaplains:
The government’s $247 million school chaplaincy program could face the axe under a prospective Labor government, with ALP Senator Doug Cameron calling for a “secular Australia” and separation of religion and the state. Grilling Education Minister Simon Birmingham over the Federal Government’s decision to extend the contentious program for a further four years, Senator Cameron said he was concerned for children’s welfare under the scheme and that it was Labor’s view that the funding would be better spent training qualified school counsellors. “I support a secular Australia and … separation between school and state,” he told a hearing of the Senate Education and Employment Committee. The comment is likely to ignite speculation around Labor’s commitment to retaining a chaplaincy program of some form, which it has previously supported while in government. The program, which provides between $20,000 and $24,000 to more than 3000 schools enabling them to employ chaplains, also came under fire from Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who claimed that some contracted religious organisations were promoting gay conversion therapy, exorcisms and healing mental illness with prayer.
www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/labor-could-axe-247-million-school-chaplaincy-program/news-story/86f7e19ba458473d05eb311fb7d063c6?fbclid=IwAR2afrPqxsmhEPR_oX2QCyIGuOZ_A_3FjJB2Xg1jKj8nUk0qujHL_8Hvk-0&nk=4eb9eec5ef94761caf7b0f3843fb713f-1542937879